Civil suits
The civil litigation efforts to date are not totally wasted, because they have resulted in the accumulation of a huge body of damning evidence against Obama/Soetoro, revealing not only ineligibility, but fraud and treason on his part and those of his enablers. I’m not really sure how someone who may not even be a citizen can be convicted of treason, but it’s good to cover all the bases. The accusers have also built more public support for prosecution and gathered a cadre of people to act in concert to help accomplish this, while mapping successful, unsuccessful and future potential courses of action.
Many people dedicated to Obama’s removal have concluded that criminal prosecution presents a opportunity. The American Grand Jury gathered evidence, deliberated and developed its presentments http://americangrandjury.org/public/ in October, 2009. There is still the matter of identifying a likely jurisdiction to prosecute in, which does not look as though it will be easy. We don’t know if this could take place in multiple jurisdictions simultaneously, with different charges.
Impeachment
Some in the Obama/Soetoro Eligibility Movement say that it is absurd to impeach someone who was never legally president anyway. Obama/Soetoro supporters point to legal language that says Congress should deal with an illegal president. Still others say that Quo Warranto or criminal fraud prosecution are appropriate routes.
Impeachment is probably politically impossible until after the 2010 elections and/or prior access to some of the relevant records currently “sealed,” although it is very possible that documents out in the field will come to light before that. The Kenyan birth certificate (while needing Kenyan confirmation), 39 Social Security numbers and evidence proving both parents weren’t U.S. citizens, are examples of that.
Publicize Evidence
The attorneys running civil suits to remove Obama/Soetoro have revealed reams of damning evidence already, which has succeeded in winning over or casting doubts in the minds of millions concerning Obama’s highly questionable eligibility for the presidency, even with an almost total MSM blackout. Recent surveys have revealed between half and 80% of those polled doubting his eligibility, or at least demanding to see some proof to assure themselves. Attorneys such as Orly Taitz fully recognize that the court of public opinion is as important as the legal courts and have put much of their energies into publicizing such damning facts and likely hypothesis about Obama/Soetoro’s (in)eligibility.
More detailed information here.
more on the workings of the grand jury here.
