The federal appeals court said that the trail court had improperly imposed its own ideas of hot to write a contract over those of the Air Force.
"The court's attempt to write the [request for proposals] to account for the impact of aging aircraft in the manner the court preferred went beyond the scope of the court's review and amounted to an impermissible substitution of the court's judgment for the agency's," the court wrote in its opinion.
About EQUITIES:
Since 1951, EQUITIES Magazine has been a leading media company providing business editorial content designed to serve the needs of business leaders, professionals, institutional investors and retail investors. We are focused on business and the business of making money, not on lifestyle subjects. We publish original reporting in print and on our website, as well as select content at www.nasdaq.com. For 28 years we have hosted our own branded investor conferences that connect public company CEO’s with our loyal readers in the investment community.
Sign up for a free one-year subscription to EQUITIES Magazine
